https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
This behaviour is what the standard (still) requires.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
Arthur O'Dwyer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
--- Comment #3 from TC ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> In which case both EDG and Clang get this wrong, as they print "12"
I know that Clang 3.7+ implemented DR1467 without 2137 (in which case "12"
would be the right output)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
In which case both EDG and Clang get this wrong, as they print "12"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
