https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(gdb) p p
$2 = (const void *) 0x1f0
is the TREE_TYPE of a CEIL_MOD_EXPR. That looks like a bogus pointer to me.
That CEIL_MOD_EXPR is at 0x75bd0b48. It's first allocated as TYPE_DECL
for me, then as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> Ok, so
>
> page_table table = G.lookup;
> uintptr_t high_bits = (uintptr_t) p & ~ (uintptr_t) 0x;
> while (table->high_bits != high_bits)
> t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so
page_table table = G.lookup;
uintptr_t high_bits = (uintptr_t) p & ~ (uintptr_t) 0x;
while (table->high_bits != high_bits)
table = table->next;
base = &table->table[0];
here we a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jan Smets from comment #7)
> Should I open a different issue for that?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #7 from Jan Smets ---
Should I open a different issue for that?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
But it ICEs differently, so the reduction is bogus:
> ./cc1plus -quiet t.c -m32 -w
t.c:2:23: error: field ‘TYPES’ has incomplete type ‘UINT’
typedef struct { UINT TYPES } eType;
^
t.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #5 from Jan Smets ---
Reduced test case by creduce
struct UINT;
typedef struct { UINT TYPES } eType;
fn1(eType) {
gcc version 5.3.1 20160411 (GCC)
= gcc-5-branch @ 0efe1cc72d37ff1173b52cf6bc3f17bd0ccb59f3
target = x86_64-unknown-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, but with the always collect options presumably it might be easier to
reduce the testcase more, so creduce and/or delta might be successful on it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #3 from Jan Smets ---
output is the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70617
--- Comment #1 from Jan Smets ---
with checking=all
../pchip_code/vfp_combined_c.cpp:85:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault
0xd42735 crash_signal
.././gcc-5.3.1/gcc/toplev.c:383
0x732f37 c_tree_chain_next
.././gcc-5.3.
12 matches
Mail list logo
