https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Feb 17 08:25:30 2015
New Revision: 220748
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220748&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65075
* constexpr.c (check_constexpr_bind_expr_vars): Allow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, makes sense, I've just been looking for what the flag is for the lambda
types. I can add the testcase and bootstrap/regtest it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Hi Jakub. Something like the below passes testing and works for the testcase:
Index: constexpr.c
===
--- constexpr.c(revision 220731)
+++ c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65075
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
