https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:30:00 2015
New Revision: 220047
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220047&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/64314
PR c++/57510
* typeck2.c (split_nonconstant_init_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yep, I do not see how target expr can work here.
The assert simply tests that in constructor all variables are wrapped within
ADDR_EXPR as taking an address of variable is the only way gimplified ctor can
reffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64314
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |c++
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
