https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #8 from Tavian Barnes ---
Actually it is a regression: according to http://gcc.godbolt.org/, GCC 4.6.4
compiled it correctly with -std=c++0x and
typedef decltype(helper(0)) type;
instead of
using type = decltype(helper(0));
wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Dec 19 00:02:05 2014
New Revision: 218880
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218880&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-12-18 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/63723
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #4 from Tavian Barnes ---
Still happens with 4.9.2 though. Is a backport of the fix possible?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
--- Comment #2 from Tavian Barnes ---
It's decltype(requires_conversion({std::declval()})). Not sure why
it says .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63723
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
