http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini ---
... of course I meant that dependent_type_p returns true for enum E therein.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |NEW
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
Known to fail|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2005-09-17 20:29 ---
Subject: Re: [DR 502] Dependency of nested enumerations and enumerators
"reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The code snippet from comment #4 is now accepted on the 4.0 bra
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-17
20:27 ---
Here's a link to DR 502:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#502
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6273
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-17
20:03 ---
The code snippet from comment #4 is now accepted on the 4.0 branch
and mainline due to Mark's patch for PR21514:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-09/msg00996.html
The anonymous enum is again treated
