https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62116
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62116
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62116
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62116
--- Comment #2 from Shafik Yaghmour ---
I am happy to be mistaken here, but it seems like section 6.8 paragraph 1
applies, for example if we have the following:
int(y) = 10;
it is being treated as a declaration not a cast and further more secti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62116
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Shafik Yaghmour from comment #0)
> as far as I can tell both gcc 4.8.x and clang are correct here based on my
> reading of section 8.3 paragraph 6:
>
> int(::x) ;
>
> is equivalent to:
>
> i
