https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
--- Comment #9 from Tony Kelman ---
Sure. In a configure.ac, (in this case using autoconf 2.59, not sure the most
recent version for which this applies) a macro like
AC_CHECK_DECL([rand],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_RAND],[1],
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Gutson
---
Could you please detail *exactly* what the problem is, what the output error is
and what does autotools do in its probe?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
Tony Kelman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony at kelman dot net
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Gutson
---
Thanks Manuel.
1) I didn't see a warning regarding the old use of -pedantic rather than
-Wpedantic
2) I'll change that, after the C++ FE maintainer sees the patch in order to not
pollute the thread with mor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
So keep pinging it, bugzilla isn't the right place.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Gutson
---
It went, but I got no answer.
FWIW: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00026.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60850
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
patches should go to the gcc-patches list, not bugzilla
10 matches
Mail list logo
