http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to hubert.vansteenhuyse from comment #3)
> Of course it is, the example is merely a pseudo code to make clear what
> happened.
Didn't you read http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to hubert.vansteenhuyse from comment #3)
> Of course it is, the example is merely a pseudo code to make clear what
> happened.
That's my point, pseudo-code is useless, if we can't reproduce the issue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #3 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #2)
> Your example is bogus: { and } don't match, main must return int, etc. If I
> fix it so it compiles, I don't see any crash.
Of course it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60213
--- Comment #1 from hubert.vansteenhuyse at freecode dot be ---
struct A {
A *a[2];
A() { a[0] = 0; a[1] = 0; }
~A(){ if(a[0]) delete a[0]; if(a[1]) delete a[1];
}
void main(){
A *a = new A();
a->a[0] = new A();
a->a[1] = new A();
delete a; /
