[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 --- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse --- Author: glisse Date: Mon Feb 3 19:07:55 2014 New Revision: 207436 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=207436&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2014-02-03 Marc Glisse PR c++/53017 PR c++/59211 gcc/c-family/

[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #3) > IMO the explicit conversion is necessary here and the fact that it doesn't > work without it is not a bug. Note that a scoped enumeration type does not > implicitly

[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 --- Comment #2 from Nadav Har'El --- Amazing, this workaround indeed works :-) Thanks! With the constexpr prio, indeed using prio+0 solved the problem. For the enum class, prio::second, I can't use addition (because it isn't implemented in this

[Bug c++/59211] init_priority doesn't work with constant expressions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59211 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Similar to PR 53017 (does the same +0 workaround work?). The main difference with constructor seems to be a call to default_conversion.