https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
That's PR 58876, which I intend to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
Andrew Gallagher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrewjcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Tudor Bosman from comment #0)
> In C++11, we can declare a class as "final" to indicate that it can't be
> derived from. In that case, having a public non-virtual destructor is fine,
> even if t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58140
--- Comment #1 from Tudor Bosman ---
(Tested with gcc 4.7.1, compiled with -std=c++11 -Wnon-virtual-dtor