http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
18:32:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:52 2013
New Revision: 196086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196086
Log:
PR c++/55710
* semantics.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:18:10 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 13 18:17:39 2013
New Revision: 196025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196025
Log:
PR c++/55710
* semantics.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-13
18:15:42 UTC ---
*** Bug 55720 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-19
18:03:23 UTC ---
Thanks Daniel for the new testcase in Comment #6. I'm afraid however we still
don't have a regression, because the testcase compiles but doesn't link in
4.6.x too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #7 from Daniel Krügler
2012-12-17 13:54:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
I have now much confidence that our production code (based on GCC 4.7.2) fails
due to bug 55015. Fortunately there is a known workaround for that one.
To ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler
2012-12-15 19:55:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
So will the following do that:
//
template
struct X {
static void (*code) ();
};
template
void (*X::code) () = []{}; // Line 7
int ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-15
19:07:34 UTC ---
To repeat: in order to, so to speak, raise the priority of this issue, we need
a testcase which was accepted by 4.6.x (or 4.7.x): the testcase we have got
isn't Ok for that, bec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-12-15
19:03:10 UTC ---
Oops, 4.6.x says that NSDMIs are needed for line 10 and rejects it, that misled
me. Then, what can I say, probably the issue isn't a regression and it's only
superficially simil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-12-15 18:57:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Note that my first example is not related to NSDMIs, it occurs in a static data
member initializer.
The actual reason for understanding the possible reasons
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-15
18:29:33 UTC ---
Related to PR 55015.
12 matches
Mail list logo