http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #14 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-23
16:05:48 UTC ---
gcc 4.5.4 does not suffer from the problem compiling the attached repro code,
indicating this is a 4.6 regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-22
15:04:23 UTC ---
Still, you reported the issue as fixed in 4_7-branch, thus unless you think
it's a regression, it seems highly unlikely that it will be fixed in that
branch too, unless you vol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Richard Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #9 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-20
15:45:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Note that, as I said already, I can't reproduce anywhere, not even in current
> 4_6-branch (on x86_64-linux -m32). Did you actually try it?
I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-19
17:25:08 UTC ---
Note that, as I said already, I can't reproduce anywhere, not even in current
4_6-branch (on x86_64-linux -m32). Did you actually try it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #7 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-19
17:24:14 UTC ---
So 4.6 branch is dead? Or no more i386 support?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Richard Perrin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #3 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-16
17:50:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I can't reproduce this on x86_64-linux, neither -m64 nor -m32. Tried 4.6.3,
> current 4_6-branch, 4_7-branch and mainline.
I have tried 4.7.1 and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-11-16
17:30:55 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this on x86_64-linux, neither -m64 nor -m32. Tried 4.6.3,
current 4_6-branch, 4_7-branch and mainline.
Somebody can?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #1 from Richard Perrin 2012-11-16
17:23:11 UTC ---
Oops:
s/3.4.6/4.6.3/ on all above.
All references to gcc 3.4.6 should actually be gcc 4.6.3. I'm apparently
dyslexic or something today.
15 matches
Mail list logo