https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
std::addressof can be constexpr with -std=gnu++XX, and even in strict mode
std::__addressof can be constexpr for internal use in libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
Given that there exists the still open issue
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2296
should this bugzilla issue remain open?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-23
21:06:09 UTC ---
Ok, thanks, I wasn't there. Then please somebody add a note to that other PR.
In any case, the other PR being about us actually accepting reint casts for the
time being, I think
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-23 20:56:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
During the Portland meeting the issue
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1384
was discussed and core had consensus *not* to suppor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-10-23
20:53:41 UTC ---
Daniel, I'm confused: didn't we agree in that other open PR we have got about
reinterpret_cast vs constexpr that actually the Standard should be amended
exactly to allow this me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler
2012-10-23 18:15:38 UTC ---
I agree, an intrinsic is needed
