http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Jakub is right WRT onepart vs non-onepart vars. Now, I can't think of any why
the union/intersection couldn't be done incrementally, and only for changed
incoming sets (but how would you tell an incoming se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> As usual, the iteration order imposed by pre_and_rev_postorder isn't the best
> one for a forward dataflow problem. Using inverted_post_order_compute
> improves
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53958
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stevenb.gcc at gmail dot