http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-08
22:14:43 UTC ---
Author: manu
Date: Tue May 8 22:14:34 2012
New Revision: 187300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=187300
Log:
2012-05-09 Manuel López-Ibáñez
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-08 15:26:51 UTC ---
On 5/7/2012 12:25 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Could you test on hppa?
The patch fixes the compilation error.
>
>
> Actually, I am not sure whether "if (!tem || int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-05-07
16:25:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In general, build_range_check can return NULL_TREE. Just matter of doing:
>
> if (tem && integer_zerop (tem))
> return;
>
> like a few line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-05-07
15:11:54 UTC ---
In general, build_range_check can return NULL_TREE. Just matter of doing:
if (tem && integer_zerop (tem))
return;
like a few lines below?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-05-07
11:18:06 UTC ---
Introduced in r187194.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53261
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
