http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-29 15:40:27
UTC ---
Author: glisse
Date: Thu Nov 29 15:40:16 2012
New Revision: 193938
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193938
Log:
2012-11-29 Marc Glisse
PR c++/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-28 21:52:54
UTC ---
Handling subscripts will be harder. Currently, v[1] is turned into ((const
long*)&v)[1]. But (const long*)&v doesn't work as a constant expression. So we
would need to change the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #28820|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse 2012-11-28 17:25:51
UTC ---
Created attachment 28820
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28820
Incomplete patch
Slightly ridiculous: with this patch, v+v still fails because we don't manag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53094
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com