[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

2014-08-27 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

2014-08-27 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Aug 27 17:03:34 2014 New Revision: 214579 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214579&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-08-27 Paolo Carlini PR c++/52892 * semanti

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

2013-05-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

2012-05-29 Thread adrien at guinet dot me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 Adrien Guinet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adrien at guinet dot me --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c++/52892] Function pointer loses constexpr qualification

2012-04-07 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52892 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2012-04-07 13:15:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) [..] > Based on my reading of the standard, this should be allowed behavior, and > works as expected with clang 3.1 (152539). I agree that this should work,