http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #6 from M.L. Hekkelman 2012-01-03
07:44:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Following your logic, if I rewrite the code from:
> >
> > return data.e[-1];
> >
> > to
> >
> > int* ep = data.e;
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-02
19:32:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Following your logic, if I rewrite the code from:
>
> return data.e[-1];
>
> to
>
> int* ep = data.e;
> return ep[-1];
>
> It would be valid, r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #4 from M.L. Hekkelman 2012-01-02
19:08:10 UTC ---
Beste jakub,
maandag 2 januari 2012, 18:10:17, schreef je:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #2 from M.L. Hekkelman 2012-01-02
17:03:46 UTC ---
Beste paolo.carlini,
maandag 2 januari 2012, 17:23:42, schreef je:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
> --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini
> 2012-01-02 16:23:42 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02
16:23:42 UTC ---
Maybe I'm just tired (sorry in case) but I really don't see how this can
possibly work: *negative* index?!? Can you explain?
