http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Kreb
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #7 from Ollie Wild 2012-01-02 17:35:07 UTC
---
I'm on vacation until Jan. 6.
For compiler related questions, please email c-compiler-t...@google.com.
If you need to contact a manager, please email lp-m...@google.com.
Thanks,
Ollie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02
17:34:19 UTC ---
Andreas, can we close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-14
13:05:35 UTC ---
> r182175 fixed one failure on s390x but introduced a couple of new fails:
>
> < FAIL: libgomp.c/atomic-2.c execution test
> ---
> > FAIL: libgomp.c++/for-2.C -O0 (test for ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-12-14
12:02:47 UTC ---
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/for-2.C: In function 'void f7(int, int, int)':^M
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/for-2.C:87:3: error: invalid increment
expression^M
compiler exited with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-12-09
20:18:31 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 9 20:18:22 2011
New Revision: 182175
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182175
Log:
PR c++/51151
* call.c (perform_implicit_con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
