http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-02
20:16:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Nov 2 20:16:43 2011
New Revision: 180794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180794
Log:
PR c++/50810
gcc/c-family
* c-opts.c (c_co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #18 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-24
12:35:49 UTC ---
Paolo, I am sorry to say it so bluntly but this solution is nonsense:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg02160.html
I know it is what Gabriel requested, but it doesn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-23
21:56:21 UTC ---
Now that the patch needs to be recommitted, I would suggest another minor
improvement. Please, remove the %qE so we do not print nonsense!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-23
21:43:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Patch needs preliminary clean-ups in gcc/config, etc.
It seems to me that enabling -Wc++0x-compat with -Wall is not a good idea
anyway. I guess many
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #15 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-23 21:15:11 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 23 21:15:08 2011
New Revision: 180349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180349
Log:
/c-family
2011-10-23 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-23 20:59:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 23 20:59:43 2011
New Revision: 180348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180348
Log:
/c-family
2011-10-23 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-23 18:34:51 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 23 18:34:45 2011
New Revision: 180343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180343
Log:
/c-family
2011-10-23 Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-23
02:12:42 UTC ---
Great. I'll post the patch tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-23 02:06:56
UTC ---
I think that makes sense, yes. People can always specify -Wno-narrowing if they
don't want it.
"paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |
|com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-22
04:38:15 UTC ---
Makes sense to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-22
01:24:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning
> > of
> > check_narrowing: probably we don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-21
22:57:31 UTC ---
(detail: not sure about the 'if (!warn_narrowing) return;' at the beginning of
check_narrowing: probably we don't want -Wno-narrowing to suppress the warnings
enabled of -Wc++0x-compat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50810
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
20 matches
Mail list logo
