http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50096
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50096
--- Comment #5 from Javier 2011-08-16 21:52:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Are you sure you haven't edited Stmt.cpp to remove 'const' from the definition
> of the getSourceRange_t typedef? That would also explain the error.
ups! I though
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50096
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-16
10:29:30 UTC ---
Are you sure you haven't edited Stmt.cpp to remove 'const' from the definition
of the getSourceRange_t typedef? That would also explain the error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50096
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-08-16
09:44:48 UTC ---
the C++ front end doesn't care about x86 vs sparc, so I don't see why the
platform would matter, but as it compiles on other platforms that's all the
more reason that you need to pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50096
--- Comment #2 from Javier 2011-08-16 09:36:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> please read the bug reporting instructions and provide the information
> requested:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ - specifically provide preprocessed source, not a
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50096
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
