https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
OK here's the documentation patch:
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -3383,6 +3383,11 @@ object to the same type, to a base class of that type,
or to void; such
a conversion function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> The description of what the warning is supposed to do is still incredibly
> vague and unspecified.
It's whatever you agreed to here:
(In reply to Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||87403
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
09:20:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > all the
> > standalones will fail to compile and build their application.
>
> Huh? Why?
Oops, I meant to put that "Why?" below, not here (I know why i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
