http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48816
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-08 13:55:10 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun May 8 13:55:07 2011
New Revision: 173549
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173549
Log:
2011-05-08 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48816
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48816
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48816
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-29 12:08:57 UTC ---
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> It is "used" in i += 3. I suppose we should ignore value-updates in
> use analysis.
See PR 44677.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48816
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|