[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29 14:24:15 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 29 14:24:09 2011 New Revision: 171663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171663 Log: PR c++/47570 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to work|

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-17 02:36:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Mar 17 02:36:04 2011 New Revision: 171083 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171083 Log: PR c++/47570 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta

[Bug c++/47570] "one() >= 0" isn't constexpr for unsigned int, yet == and > is.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|