http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #14 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-15 09:57:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 15 09:57:29 2012
New Revision: 185424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185424
Log:
/c-family
2012-03-15 Manuel López-Ibáñ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26658|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-14
16:45:20 UTC ---
> Any number of notes will be matched by a single "note:" test, since the
> testsuite does not detect duplicates. There is PR about this somewhere.
I'm not sure the issue is just abo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-14
16:26:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> By the way, for the actual dejagnu testcase, a few weeks ago I noticed that
> apparently testing for 'note:' is pretty weak, like if additional notes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-14
14:44:03 UTC ---
Agreed about the testcase, of course.
By the way, for the actual dejagnu testcase, a few weeks ago I noticed that
apparently testing for 'note:' is pretty weak, like if additional no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-14
14:27:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Thanks Manuel. Thus, I'm going to test your patch. Was wondering, maybe we
> want
> the nit: 'n_total > template_backtrace_limit + 2' n the condition,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-14
12:36:57 UTC ---
Created attachment 26658
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26658
Draft
This is a slightly tweaked and extended version of the patch which I actually
booted and teste
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2012-02-13
17:09:50 UTC ---
Any of you has a minimal self-contained testcase? The ones I used when
implementing this, no longer need this option. Thanks.
This is my totally untested but compiles patch. Pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Gabriel Redner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gredner at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||brian.amberg at unibas dot
15 matches
Mail list logo
