[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-03-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-11 03:47 --- fixed as of comment #11 -- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Sta

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-03-10 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #12 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-03-11 03:28 --- Ben, Is basic-eh-map.darwin10.ii still failing to compile for you on current gcc trunk? On x86_64-apple-darwin10, I am finding that g++-4 basic-eh-map.darwin10.ii -S -m64 -std=c++0x -v -O2 -g g++-

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-27 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-27 20:13 --- Subject: Bug 42346 Author: bkoz Date: Wed Jan 27 20:12:41 2010 New Revision: 156303 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156303 Log: 2010-01-27 Benjamin Kosnik PR c++/42346 * test

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-05 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 01:08 --- RE: PR40459 The errors are different between that PR and this one. So, my guess is that these are not related. That is also a warning, and this is an error. FWIW, I think this should be a P1. -- http://gcc.gnu

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-05 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #9 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2010-01-05 19:52 --- Might this bug be related to PR40459? Does the PR42346 test case work on gcc pre-r148492? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42346

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 01:10 --- Glad you can reproduce now. Sorry I was so vague before. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42346

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-04 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-05 00:19 --- Regarding "There's nothing funny or weird about the compile line folks", well, actually, it was really needed. Turns out it doesn't fail without "-g", which is why I didn't see it. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 20:38 --- Optimization Error on Valid -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42346

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-04 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-04 20:35 --- Created an attachment (id=19468) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19468&action=view) remove -O1 to cause fail With this patch, the following gcc: ames:gcc benjamin$ ./gcc/xgcc -v Using built-in spe

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2010-01-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-01 12:21 --- (In reply to comment #3) > GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 20091206 (experimental) > (x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0) > Fails. Works with g++ 20100101 (rev. 155544), on x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0. Compiled with: g++ -std

[Bug c++/42346] darwin instantiation vs. optimization oddity

2009-12-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-10 16:06 --- GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 20091206 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin10.2.0) compiled by GNU C version 4.5.0 20091206 (experimental), GMP version 4.3.1, MPFR version 2.4.1, MPC version 0.8 GGC heuristics: --p