https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
--- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Dec 17 01:38:35 2015
New Revision: 231734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Correct ChangeLogs for PR c++/42121 and related.
Modified:
trunk/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
Patch posted for review:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02595.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
--- Comment #7 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-23 14:53 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> OK, can't argue with not breaking existing headers I suppose. But this is to
> me clearly a bogus usage. What are the semantics of using internal zero sized
> arrays in a struct? They ha
--- Comment #6 from david dot resnick at comverse dot com 2009-11-23 14:15
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re: g++ should warn or error on internal 0 size
> array in struct
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, david dot resnick at comverse dot com wrote:
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > (
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-11-20 20:57 ---
Subject: Re: g++ should warn or error on internal 0 size
array in struct
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, david dot resnick at comverse dot com wrote:
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (In reply to comment #2)
> > > In standard
--- Comment #4 from david dot resnick at comverse dot com 2009-11-20 18:56
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > In standard C, a size 0 array is forbidden, at least in C99 doc I have
> > handy,
> Yes, but it's a long-standing GNU extension:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/o
--- Comment #3 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 18:49 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In standard C, a size 0 array is forbidden, at least in C99 doc I have handy,
Yes, but it's a long-standing GNU extension:
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.2/gcc/Zero-Length.html#Zero-Le
--- Comment #2 from david dot resnick at comverse dot com 2009-11-20 18:38
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Looks like this is for compatibility with GNU C, which allows it, but only in
> the form char b[0] not char b[]
b[] seems simply broken unless last in an array for the C99 "flexibl
--- Comment #1 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-20 18:09 ---
Looks like this is for compatibility with GNU C, which allows it, but only in
the form char b[0] not char b[]
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121
12 matches
Mail list logo
