--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-15 19:56
---
r154190 is the subversion version I built and tested, this project doesn't use
cvs anymore.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
--- Comment #8 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-11-15 19:19 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Works for me now (r154190).
I have no idea what r154190 means, but I can confirm
that the snapshot of 2009112 seems to work ok,
even at optimisation level -O3 -march=native.
This looks fixed
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-11-15 17:44
---
Works for me now (r154190). If you can still see something wrong, please
reopen.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-02 11:45
---
Or alternately playing a bit with the debugger, of course ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-02 11:36
---
Still, you can certainly help the project by temporarily splitting the two
checks in your local tree, rebuilding, and telling us if both PRs fail on the
same one or not...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-02 09:47 ---
No, the asserts are enabled in release builds, so they should be combined to
reduce executable size.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
--- Comment #3 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-08-02 09:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> PR40866 ?
Maybe - there are many ways to fail a sanity check.
I notice that the line where it crashes is of the form
gcc_assert(!X && Y);
It might be better to split this into two gcc_as
--- Comment #2 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-08-02 09:33
---
PR40866 ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
--- Comment #1 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2009-08-02 08:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=18284)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18284&action=view)
C++ source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40938
