--- Comment #9 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 15:12 ---
Fixed in 4.6 (trunk).
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-07 15:12 ---
Subject: Bug 40239
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Apr 7 15:11:42 2010
New Revision: 158066
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=158066
Log:
Fix PR c++/40239
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/40239
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-13 09:21 ---
Subject: Re: Aggregate initialization requires copy
constructor
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:33:56PM -, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
wrote:
> Since we are talking of etiquette, and with the obvious caveats
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-12 23:33
---
Since we are talking of etiquette, and with the obvious caveats that my mother
language is italian + all the caveats about metaphorical uses of language, I
would also suggest keeping to a minimum the uses of "p
--- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 21:52 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I will stop adding the 'Contributed by' line from now, and will remove
> it from this patch. If you want, I can remove it from all the test cases
> I did commit.
I don't think that's necessary,
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org 2010-01-12 21:49 ---
Subject: Re: Aggregate initialization requires copy
constructor
Le mar. 12 janv. 2010 à 20:58:01 (-), bangerth at gmail dot com a écrit:
> As a matter of etiquette (I think we've had
> this conversation with others
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-01-12 20:58 ---
Dodji,
thanks for the patch. As a matter of etiquette (I think we've had
this conversation with others in the past already): in your patch,
you mark the testcase as "Contributed by Dodji Seketeli", but in
fact the testcas
--- Comment #2 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-12 11:00 ---
Posted a candidate fix to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg00536.html
Please not that as this is a not a regression and it touches the core language
I doubt the patch is going to committed for 4.5
--
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:44 ---
Confirmed. Not a regression.
--
bangerth at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
10 matches
Mail list logo
