--- Comment #12 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-24 05:14 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-23 21:24 ---
Subject: Bug 38880
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 23 21:23:58 2009
New Revision: 144395
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=144395
Log:
PR c++/38880
* varasm.c (initializer_constant_va
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-20 05:35 ---
Er, not that one, this one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-02/msg00882.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38880
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-20 05:34 ---
New patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-01/msg01309.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38880
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-28 19:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/init/const7.C XFAILed
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, jason at redhat dot com wrote:
> Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/init/const7.C XFAILed
>
> rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> >> Why
--- Comment #7 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-01-28 16:29 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/init/const7.C XFAILed
rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
>> Why do it in the FE? This seems like a language-independent optimization.
>
> Do it in the FE if the FE wants it to be optimi
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-28 10:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/init/const7.C XFAILed
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, jason at redhat dot com wrote:
> --- Comment #5 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-01-27 23:25 ---
> Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression]
--- Comment #5 from jason at redhat dot com 2009-01-27 23:25 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/init/const7.C XFAILed
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I just found this, I tried to fix this in fold but in the end agreed with
> Andrew that the C++ FE should do what the C FE
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-27 16:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=17193)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17193&action=view)
example patch
I just found this, I tried to fix this in fold but in the end agreed with
Andrew
that the C++ FE
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38880
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-16 20:41 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00448.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00581.html
Hmm, I think the front-end should be doing the trick of &16B->y into 16B + 4
just like the C front-en
12 matches
Mail list logo
