http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-14 14:43:06 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 14 14:43:03 2011
New Revision: 179984
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179984
Log:
/cp
2011-10-14 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13 14:27:12
UTC ---
Just use composite_pointer_type. :)
Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-13
09:38:57 UTC ---
Thanks Jason, I thought we had to purely *add* overloads. Therefore we'll have
to refactor the code a bit I guess, to always have a single call at the end of
add_builtin_candidate. For
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-13
02:49:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So, for operator== for example, we reach the end of add_builtin_candidate, the
> conditional is true, and we proceed with two calls to build_builtin_candidat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-12
22:14:03 UTC ---
So, for operator== for example, we reach the end of add_builtin_candidate, the
conditional is true, and we proceed with two calls to build_builtin_candidate
for pairs of const int* and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew.stubbs at st dot com
--- Comment #
10 matches
Mail list logo
