--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 17:25 ---
That looks very invasive for the branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37582
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-12-11 17:20 ---
It is fixed by revision 133519:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-03/msg00738.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg01285.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37582
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-11 11:45 ---
Janis, can we have your regression hunting services to look what fixed this
on the mainline?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 21:22 ---
Couldn't cmath just use:
template
inline
typename __gnu_cxx::__promote_2<
-typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if<__is_arithmetic<_Tp>::__value
-&& __is_arithmetic<_Up>::__value,
+typename __gnu_c
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-22 19:55 ---
Is && part of GNU C++98 now?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-19 09:34 ---
Shorter testcase:
#include
class super_real {
public:
super_real (double);
};
bool operator&& (int i, const super_real& a);
double square(double a) {
return std::pow(a,2.0);
}
--
rguenth at gcc dot g
