[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2025-04-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||123321artyom at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2022-05-25 Thread foom at fuhm dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685 --- Comment #5 from James Y Knight --- (oops submitted commit by mistake, continuing...) Strangely, it appears that Clang and GCC both have odd behaviors currently, but somewhat opposites: - GCC appears to evaluate weak constants _only_ in fron

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2022-05-25 Thread foom at fuhm dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685 James Y Knight changed: What|Removed |Added CC||foom at fuhm dot net --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2017-08-17 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2017-08-14 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2008-07-01 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-07-01 11:35 --- Subject: Re: New: clarify/diagnose use of weak constant See the inconclusive discussion at (the original message was the previous month), and bug 3

[Bug c++/36685] clarify/diagnose use of weak constant

2008-07-01 Thread algrant at acm dot org
--- Comment #1 from algrant at acm dot org 2008-07-01 10:21 --- Similar argument applies to __attribute__((visibility("default"))) . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36685