[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 --- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor --- The link works for me. An older version of the paper is here: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3396.htm If that doesn't work for you either try searching for the paper titled Dynamic

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 --- Comment #17 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #12) > Confirmed. As noted in bug 67911, the solution proposed for the next > version of C++ is the following: > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mhadji at gmail dot com --- Comment #16 f

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||b7.10110111 at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilja.honkonen at helsinki dot fi --- Com

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #13 fro

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hayim at post dot tau.ac.il --- Comment #10 fro

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sergey.v.maslov at intel |

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-04-24 02:42 --- *** Bug 43874 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-09 01:09 --- We can solve it with 1. A target should define MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT properly. 2. g++ should issue an error when the default new operator is used on a type whose alignment is greater than MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT. 3. It

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2008-05-07 11:25 --- Subject: Re: C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator On Wed, 7 May 2008, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > aligned memory. PPC LV2 returns 16byte aligned memory. PPC Linux should be

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-07 05:00 --- (In reply to comment #4) > The default new operator is implemented within gcc. It should be > possible to let g++ know the alignment returned by the new operator. The default one is but the user can override it as d

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-07 04:56 --- The default new operator is implemented within gcc. It should be possible to let g++ know the alignment returned by the new operator. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-05-07 04:21 --- How is the compiler supposed to know about what alignment malloc can produce? How can it know that ::operator new doesn't increase the alignment automatically? W. -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: W

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-05-06 16:28 --- Trevor, can you scale down your original proposal just to issue an error when there is no class-specific operator new for a type with an alignment greater than what malloc() guarantees? It will be programmer's respon

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-06 16:11 --- Actually we (Sony) have come up with a solution but not much as come about with it though. If you read Trevor's proposal, you would have found we did come up with one. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg