--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35708
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 20:10 ---
Fixed for 4.3.1 and 4.4.0. Patch seems risky for 4.2 at this point.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 19:58 ---
Subject: Bug 35708
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 9 19:57:19 2008
New Revision: 134151
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134151
Log:
PR c++/35708
* semantics.c (finish_compound_liter
--- Comment #8 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-09 16:16 ---
Subject: Bug 35708
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 9 16:15:53 2008
New Revision: 134146
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=134146
Log:
PR c++/35708
* semantics.c (finish_compound_liter
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 15:19 ---
The bug is that the temporary object created by the C99 compound literal syntax
doesn't have proper C++ temporary lifetime; the compiler treats it as living
until the end of the block, so the goto seems to be skipping
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 10:56 ---
Jason, can you have a look here?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-29 10:52 ---
Here's a shorter testcase:
struct object { int one_o; int allocstamp; };
int pgci_pointable (object obj);
void foo(void);
int main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
if (pgci_pointable((object){7,100}))
{
bad_re
--- Comment #4 from bruno at clisp dot org 2008-03-28 22:48 ---
The bug also occurs with g++ 4.3.0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35708
--- Comment #3 from bruno at clisp dot org 2008-03-28 22:46 ---
> you are entering a scope that has objects constructed.
Can you point out the sections in the ISO C++ standard that say that an 'if'
statement can create the scope for some objects?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
--- Comment #2 from sds at gnu dot org 2008-03-26 20:44 ---
so? the objects are created, used and discarded on the fly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35708
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-26 20:39 ---
I think this is invalid, you are entering a scope that has objects constructed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35708
12 matches
Mail list logo
