--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-03 03:15 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34238 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-11-26 02:17 ---
The patch below makes the Boost.Python compilation work again with
gcc svn trunk revision 130411. This solves my problem. :-)
The g++ change could be tough for people who have to keep using older
boost versions for one reaso
--- Comment #5 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-11-26 02:11 ---
cc'ing David Abrahams since the original code is his.
--
rwgk at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-11-26 01:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=14638)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14638&action=view)
reproducer preprocessed gzip'ed
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 20:47 ---
Also please attach the preprocessed source.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-25 20:46 ---
I don't think this is valid code. There is no definition for the is_const part
for the template where bind_return is in the anonymous namespace. The code was
diagnose before that date but it was not rejected becaus
--- Comment #1 from rwgk at yahoo dot com 2007-11-25 20:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=14636)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14636&action=view)
reproducer
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34229
