https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33659
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
This is actually valid code, the class name is injected and can be used in this
context (the last one is used to name the constructor otherwise).
Dup of bug 40294 which is recording all of the valid cases whi
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-10-04 18:46 ---
Yes. I believe there may also be another report about the same problem.
W.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11764 ***
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-04 17:25 ---
I think this is a dup of bug 11764.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33659
