--- Comment #9 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-08-09 16:03 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I suggest taking a technique from the STL and using an auto_array class
In practice, I find both STL and Boost are rarely used.
Such advanced tools are fine for experienced C++ programmers.
F
--- Comment #8 from fang at csl dot cornell dot edu 2007-08-09 02:54
---
Please forgive a wee bit more noise on this matter: (Yes, I know this is
resolved invalid)
If you really insist on using a pointer instead of a valarray or vector, I
suggest taking a technique from the STL and usi
--- Comment #7 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-08-06 16:06 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> This is one which you need huge dataflow analysis
Doubtful. Yes/No/Don't know flag on each pointer data
member of a class would be some of it.
> and whole program to detect this problem.
I'd
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-05 19:37 ---
This is not the business of a compiler to detect all and every programming
mismatch. It can detect some but not all. This is one which you need huge
dataflow analysis and whole program to detect this problem.
Thi
--- Comment #5 from sebor at roguewave dot com 2007-08-05 00:31 ---
There are third party tools that track these types of problems. Some of them
have started to make their way into compilers. For example, the HP static
analysis tool called Code Adviser is integrated into the HP aCC compi
--- Comment #4 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-08-04 22:09 ---
Subject: Re: add checking for array new & delete
"dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| (In reply to comment #1)
| > Special, dedicated tools exist for that task.
|
| Would you be willing to name
--- Comment #3 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-08-04 22:06 ---
Subject: Re: add checking for array new & delete
"dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The compiler can generate a whole bunch of warnings
| already.
Which fall in different mindset that the one y
"dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The compiler can generate a whole bunch of warnings
| already.
Which fall in different mindset that the one you would like.
-- Gaby
--- Comment #2 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-08-04 19:52 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Special, dedicated tools exist for that task.
Would you be willing to name three of them ?
> The above should not be the business of the *compiler*.
Why not ?
The compiler can generate a w
--- Comment #1 from gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2007-08-04 13:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: add checking for array new & delete
"dcb314 at hotmail dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Given the following C++ code
|
| class K
| {
| public:
| void f();
| void g();
|
| pri
10 matches
Mail list logo
