[Bug c++/29130] bad relocation section name

2006-09-18 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 17:58 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name FYI: I think I found the source of the problem. I am using boost::bind to create a function pointer to an object. If my class does not have a default constructor then I get the pr

[Bug c++/29130] bad relocation section name

2006-09-18 Thread jmbnyc at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from jmbnyc at gmail dot com 2006-09-18 17:24 --- Subject: Re: bad relocation section name thanks, will do. /JMB On 18 Sep 2006 17:23:33 -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-0

[Bug c++/29130] bad relocation section name

2006-09-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-18 17:23 --- collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] That means a bug in binutils and not in GCC. Report this first to redhat since that is where you got your binutils and GCC. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu do