http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29018
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-
--- Comment #10 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-17 19:18 ---
Not actively working on it (for now)
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ass
--- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-04 17:53 ---
Humm, no, anonymous enums are clearly legal, sorry about the stupid mistake.
Still, it's not completely clear to me the discussion in 7.2/5 of empty
enumerator-lists, evidently, we must assume those are illegal *only* when
--- Comment #8 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-04 17:47 ---
Hummm, with reference to the patch in Comment #9: I don't think 'enum { };' is
flagged in the standard as ill-formed because of the empty enumerator-list
(that possibility is explicitly discussed in 7.2/5), but because the
--- Comment #7 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-04 16:51 ---
On it.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot g
--- Comment #6 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-01-24 16:05 ---
Well, "I think" is all I can give. I am not a maintainer who can approve a
patch for this. If you want to work on it I would recommend doing a patch that
just involves a small subset of the test suite fixes and see if y
--- Comment #5 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-24 01:31 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I think we want to fix the test cases, but I don't want to sign up to fix them
> myself.
>
"I think" is not enough. It would be nice to be able tell to whoever takes the
burden of implementi
--- Comment #4 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-01-24 00:34 ---
I think we want to fix the test cases, but I don't want to sign up to fix them
myself.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29018
--- Comment #3 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-01-21 18:24 ---
So, do we want to fix those testcases or do we want to keep ignoring empty
enums?
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2006-09-15 16:46 ---
I took a quick look at this bug, the fix is easy, I have included a patch I
created. The problem is that there are 172 tests in the g++ and libstdc++
test suites that have empty enums in them. If we give an error on emp
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-09-11 16:09 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo
