--- Comment #11 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-27 18:00
---
Fixed in 4.1.2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-27 18:00
---
Subject: Bug 28058
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Aug 27 17:59:55 2006
New Revision: 116492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116492
Log:
PR c++/28058
* pt.c (register_specializat
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-27 17:45
---
Subject: Bug 28058
Author: mmitchel
Date: Sun Aug 27 17:45:25 2006
New Revision: 116491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116491
Log:
PR c++/28058
* pt.c (register_specializati
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-26 16:53
---
We do have code to notice use-before-specialization errors. For example:
template void f();
void g() {
f();
}
template <> void f() {}
results in an error.
However, the code to initialize static var
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-14 16:16 ---
Regression hunts on powerpc-linux showed that the original testcase with -O3
and the testcase in comment #5 with -O0 both start getting segfaults with the
following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=9
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-21 20:36 ---
cgraph_analyze_function is reentrant for non-unit-at-a-time support. However
with unit-at-a-time, the analysis happens only after unit has been finalized
and at that time frontend is not supposed to come up with new
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28058
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-12 16:39
---
Here's a testcase that crashes even at -O0 since GCC 4.1.0:
===
template struct A
{
A() {}
};
A<0> a;
template<> A<0>::A() {}
===
As Wolfgang already mentione
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-06-24 23:53 ---
*** Bug 28159 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-06-16 22:55 ---
The code is invalid, however: explicit specializations must be declared
before they are first used. In the snippet, B::B is used in foo()
before the specialization is declared. The ICE consequently also goes
away if a de
--- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-06-16 22:51 ---
Confirmed.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |c++
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.2
http://gc
13 matches
Mail list logo
