--
Bug 21799 depends on bug 8271, which changed state.
Bug 8271 Summary: Templates and pointers to const member functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8271
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08
11:08 ---
Fixed mainline
2005-07-08 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/21799
* pt.c (type_unification_real): Add is_method argument. Use it
for this pointer unification.
(fn_t
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08
11:06 ---
Subject: Bug 21799
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 11:05:52
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c
gcc/testsuite
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-06
17:02 ---
Postponed until 4.0.2.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-26 00:45
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with
pointers to members
bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
> 2005-06-24
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
2005-06-24 16:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
(Sleep deprivation during the week leads to such marvels on Fridays...)
> This PR will is about the that 4.0.1 won't
Th
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
2005-06-24 16:03 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
> Although I have not developed a patch, any patch will (more than likely) be
> non-trivial. I'll work on a fix, but don
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-24
15:53 ---
looking carefully, this is exposing an existing bug that we deduce 'const X'
against
template void f (T &, void (T::*)() );
this should not happen. Previously we must have been deducing both
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-24
13:37 ---
> > It could be fixed by backing out Nathan's patch (that, to the best of my
> > knowledge didn't fix a regression).
it did not fix a regression, but was something we wanted added (as I beleive
things like
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-23 15:20
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with
pointers to members
bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
> 2005-06-23
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
2005-06-23 15:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with
pointers to members
> Definitely a serious bug, but I'm not sure I want to try to fix it
> before 4.0.1. I'm really trying to confine mysel
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-23 15:04
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with
pointers to members
bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-23 14:51
> ---
> M
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-23 14:51
---
Mark, since you are looking for bugs to be fixed in 4.0.1 again, would
this regression between 4.0.0 and the present state of 4.0.1 interest
you? This is code that also appears in boost...
W.
--
http:
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-06-22
01:24 ---
For mainline, my patch has to be reworked as suggested by Jason in the review.
It is not a difficult work, but I am working on another couple of big patches
so don't hold your breath.
As for the release br
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-21 20:58
---
Good idea. So I tried it, and indeed this patch
2005-05-10 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/20723
* pt.c (more_specialized_fn): Member functions are unordered wrt
non-m
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2005-06-21
20:45 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
On Jun 21, 2005, at 4:43 PM, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From bangerth at i
On Jun 21, 2005, at 4:43 PM, bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
2005-06-21 20:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to
members
I think this was exposed by the patch for P
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu
2005-06-21 20:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
> I think this was exposed by the patch for PR 19203 (aka DR 214), could you
> double check that, that patch makes sense
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-06-21 16:14
---
I don't have the time to check it today, but could try tomorrow. It certainly
sounds plausible. Nathan, could you comment on this problem?
Thanks
Wolfgang
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-21
16:07 ---
I think this was exposed by the patch for PR 19203 (aka DR 214), could you
double check that, that
patch makes sense if it exposes this bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21799
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-21
16:01 ---
Confirmed in 4.0.1 20050610 also. Hmm.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|
21 matches
Mail list logo
