[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2015-03-23 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21494 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2005-12-14 Thread gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
--- Comment #6 from gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-12-15 03:40 --- Subject: Re: condensed nested namespaces "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | --- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 17:16 --- | | I'm encouraged by this

[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2005-12-14 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 17:16 --- I'm encouraged by this work!!! Great news. The reason this would be useful is that then it would be possible to use a single macro to represent both scope and namespace. Ie, #define ACTIVE_SCOPE works for namespac

[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2005-12-09 Thread machata at post dot cz
--- Comment #4 from machata at post dot cz 2005-12-09 12:54 --- Created an attachment (id=10444) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10444&action=view) Implementation of condensed nested namespaces definition, includes testcase. I sent an email with some comments to gcc-

[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2005-12-06 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-07 00:16 --- I still want this. Someday... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21494

[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2005-05-10 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 17:49 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/21494] condensed nested namespaces

2005-05-10 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 15:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8853) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8853&action=view) proposal At Kona, this seemed uncontraversial. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21494