--- Additional Comments From matz at suse dot de 2005-04-18 17:40 ---
Indeed. Okay, but then this really is an optimization regression compared
to gcc 3.3.x which compiled this just fine. As it's only rejected with
-pedantic (and I think it's a sensible extension), shouldn't we make s
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-18
17:32 ---
Yes this is invalid C++ (and is rejected by -pedantic) but we somehow declared
this as an extension see
PR 11393 which is still open and other threads within a past year.
*** This bug has been marked as a
