--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-10 03:40
---
You can use -pedantic to get rid of the automatically defining of i386 or use
-Ui386.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Comment #12 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2007-04-10 02:45 ---
Funny indeed - that's a scream :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Comment #11 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-09 18:16
---
This is really a non-bug.
The following code snippet illustrates this:
#define VAR1(i,j) i##j
#define VAR2(i,j) VAR1(i,j)
#define VAR(i) VAR2(i,__LINE__)
#line 385
int VAR(i) = 0;
==
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
21:25 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Andrew - can you confirm getting the same problem I do if you run it in 3,4,0?
yes which is why I pointed out in comment #6 the code around where the problem
is.
--
http://gc
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-03-29 21:19
---
Andrew - can you confirm getting the same problem I do if you run it in 3,4,0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
21:11 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Re comment #5: I don't get the messages reported by Andrew, and I really
> rather
> doubt that those messages (form a different compiler version than I'm using)
> are
> legit. Th
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-03-29 21:03
---
Re comment #5: I don't get the messages reported by Andrew, and I really rather
doubt that those messages (form a different compiler version than I'm using) are
legit. They are flagging stuff inside a stock "boo
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
16:01 ---
The code around the problem:
typedef typeof(to(0, models.size())) i_t386;
i_t386& a;
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-29
15:59 ---
One thing, this is definitely invalid code:
/home/ivan/ootbc/boost/include/boost/detail/dynamic_bitset.hpp:91: error:
âboost::detail::dynamic_bitset_base >::â is/uses anonymous type
/home/ivan/ootbc/boost/i
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8484|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8483|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-03-29 11:38
---
Created an attachment (id=8486)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8486&action=view)
source code (-save-temps, compressed) - good
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-03-29 11:38
---
Created an attachment (id=8485)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8485&action=view)
source code (-save-temps, compressed) - bad
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-03-29 11:37
---
Created an attachment (id=8484)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8484&action=view)
compiler output (-v) - good
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
--- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-03-29 11:37
---
Created an attachment (id=8483)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8483&action=view)
compiler output (-v) - bad
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20682
15 matches
Mail list logo
