--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28
02:09 ---
*** Bug 21089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-08 20:13
---
The fact that it worked for the integer case is by chance, since gcc
seems to have been able to replace all references to that variable
by its value, but it wasn't for the floating point case. That is
often t
--- Additional Comments From stefaandr at hotmail dot com 2005-01-07 23:31
---
If accepting floats just as integers is an extension, then why does the same
code compile without problems when using integers? (Static integer constants
also need a memory location right? Or don't they?)
bt
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
22:47 ---
Two things, this is invalid C++ in two different ways, one way is that
initializing static constants that
are not integer types is invalid (but is accepted as an extension). The other
way is that you sti