--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06
17:16 ---
Fixed in 3.4 and 4.0 branches.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06
17:12 ---
Subject: Bug 19311
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-06 17:12:12
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-06
16:59 ---
Subject: Bug 19311
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-06 16:59:19
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
15:46 ---
Fixed in the mainline. Other branches are being tested and will be
fixed once I finish retesting the patch.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat dot com 2005-02-01 15:04
---
breaks current OOo2 build
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17
16:19 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Why a new tree node? We are moving away from using trees also for container-
> type data structures. You can write a normal structure with the node that
> must
> be access-check
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-01-17
15:25 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Fixing it by queuing access checking until instantiation time
> turns out to be nasty:
> - Need to invent new tree node, the current TREE_LIST cannot
> store the line number info
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-17
14:37 ---
Patch submitted that fixes the ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01007.html
Queuing access checking until instantiation time will be addressed
in 4.1. That issue has already been covered
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-13
06:06 ---
Fixing it by queuing access checking until instantiation time
turns out to be nasty:
- Need to invent new tree node, the current TREE_LIST cannot
store the line number information.
- If only non-dependen
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12
10:49 ---
Patch in progress.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19311
--- Additional Comments From lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-10
14:11 ---
Will look at it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ler
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-10
00:50 ---
I almost think this was caused by:
2004-07-18 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-07-28 Kriang Lerdsuwanakij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/13092
Because that is when the date mat
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-08
22:52 ---
: Search converges between 2004-07-18-trunk (#489) and 2004-07-19-trunk (#490).
: Search converges between 2004-07-28-3.4 (#35) and 2004-07-29-3.4 (#36).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-01-07 20:58
---
This one is simpler:
-
template void foo (R (T::*x) ());
template void foo (R (T::*x) (C));
template struct I {
int o ();
int o () const;
};
template void bar
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19311
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07
13:45 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
16 matches
Mail list logo
