--- Comment #14 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-22 14:28 ---
Fixed for 4.3.0.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|AS
--- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 21:00 ---
Yo!
Jason, fixing this would be most appreciated by the library hackers. This is
one of those things that I would really like to see implemented before C++0x
gets too far down the road... there is a bunch of stuff de
--- Comment #12 from nathan at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-06 08:15
---
Subject: Re: __attribute__((aligned)) not working in template
mark at codesourcery dot com wrote:
> I don't think so, but I'm not quite sure I understand. Anyhow, I'm sure
> I don't have any uncontributed patch
--- Comment #11 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2007-09-06 06:16 ---
Subject: Re: __attribute__((aligned)) not working in template
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 05:50
> ---
> Vague references:
>
> http://
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #10 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-06 05:50 ---
Vague references:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg00247.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17743
Seems like Mark and/or Nathan have/had state on this that they haven't shared
with the list
--- Comment #9 from giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-10-06 06:44 ---
The patch was rejected. Not working on this anymore.
--
giovannibajo at libero dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-29 19:05
---
> Did I already open a PR for this misbehaviour in the past? What
> happened?
Yes, Gaby, the issue at large is clear, by now: see c++/17743. Here, we are
just trying to achieve *minimal* functionality, when the e
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-29 18:57 ---
Subject: Re: New: __attribute__((aligned)) not working in template
"pcarlini at suse dot de" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Unfortunately, it looks like even the very limited functionality of aligned
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-27
22:07 ---
Patch posted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg01975.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-27 15:46
---
... forgot to specify: regtested on x86_64-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19163
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-27 15:45
---
Hi again! Yes, I can confirm that the patch works fine here: regtests ok and
both the above testcase and the below pass with it, which basically amounts
to making possible a decent implementation of tr1::type_trait
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-12-27 13:24
---
> Meanwhile, Paolo, mind if I ask you to test this patch for me? You can also
> test the partial specialization, it looks like it works for me.
Sure, I will: expect some feedback from me before the end of the day
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-27
13:18 ---
We lose the alignment while tsubsting. This is a quick patch for this, I'm not
sure if there are other information we should propagate from the original array
type to the new array type, I guess the reviewe
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||gdr at integrable-solutions
||dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
15 matches
Mail list logo
