--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:15
---
Won't fix for 3.3.6. Suggest upgrade to 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21
11:17 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Additional Comments From david at starks-browning dot com 2004-12-16
10:30 ---
True, but I don't believe the patch for PR16273 is applicable to gcc-3.3.
In fact, I am unable to reproduce the fault in gcc-3.3 using the 10,000-line
test case that was attached to PR16273. Therefore, my
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-12-15
23:43 ---
The same that fixed PR 16273. This bug is basically PR16273 which was marked as
a 3.3 regression too but was closed as fixed after the patch was committed only
to 3.4 and mainline.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net
2004-12-15 20:16 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3 Regression] virtual memory exhausted
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I let GDR decide if he wants this patch to fix it for 3.3.x.
hmm, which patch?
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-15
19:19 ---
I let GDR decide if he wants this patch to fix it for 3.3.x.
--
What|Removed |Added
